Various Notes
| Discussing the future of GPS
Receivers: from the sci.geo.satellite-nav newgroup On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:36:20 -0700, "Chuck" <nospam@mindspring.com> wrote: > I'm looking for speculative opinions, particularly from this newsgroup's > veterans that have good industry contact, as to how portable consumer GPS > units are likely to evolve over the next year for various segments (outdoor, > automotive, marine). Interesting question.... > * What will happen with display technology? Will anything interesting > happen with respect to size, resolution, contrast , brightness, or color? > Or alternatively, have we hit a plateau for a while due to battery life, > etc? I think that Moore's Law will still have an effect, and so devices will get smaller (to the limits of practical screen size), battery life will get longer, color will get better and resolution higher. That is the way of technology it seems, and has been paralleled by developments in PDA's. > * Will the processor speed increase to the point where auto-routing > calculation (& re-calculation) is more responsive? I've noticed a lot of > complaints here. Most likely...if you look at how fast low power laptop Pentiums are getting, there is a lot of room for improvement here. > * Will units get any thinner or lighter? Probably both, but the screen size and antenna needs will limit how small they can realistically get. > * Will usage of Lithium-Ion rechargeable batteries become a reality? Yup....battery technology is improving...though latest stuff is costly. The Emtac (bluetooth wireless GPS) has a 6.4 hour life before charges if fully on (non-trickle mode)...which is not bad for something smaller than the smallest cell phone on the market. > * Will vendors start using non-proprietary flash memory expansion ports like > those we find in digital cameras? This I doubt...since all the consumer GPS manufacturers have been following a proprietary technology approach for quite some time. The only way I can see that changing if some new competitors come into the market and give Garmin (and others) a run for their money...which I think might happen. > * Speaking of flash memory, will complaints from end-users on the slowness > of map downloads drive the adoption of USB interfaces? Eventually bound to happen, since many new PC's and laptops will not have old style serial ports. > * Will GPS add-on usage for PDA's grow significantly? Ah....now this leads me to some more interesting speculation (or maybe some wishful thinking). The problem with consumer GPS's has been their lack of upgradeability or expansion capability, coupled with their proprietary technology. There is no easy way to run your own software on a GPS device, or even load your own maps (from scans, .jpgs/gifs and the like) without a lot of trouble. When we also look at in-vehicle systems, there is an issue there...sure you can get OnStar in some higher end GM vehicles...but what about all the other older wheels out there? And then, these systems tend to have limited upgrade/expansion capability due to their hard wired nature. Based on my recent work with the Emtac GPS unit, which has no display....no controls (cept on/off button) and which sends out position info over a built in bluetooth connection, I think this might be the vision of the future. It would be possible to create a modular system (perfect for vehicles) where each component is separate and distinct, with dynamic interaction between components implemented over bluetooth (or 802.11 WiFi in vehicles where power constraints are not so severe). So you might have a GPS unit like the Emtac that just tracks and transmits position. You might have a general purpose processor (I'm partial to embedded Java processors due to their debugability and productivity in app dev), a display panel which could be a totally separate option (a removable LCD panel display), internet/communications connectivity device (which could be as simple as a bluetooth enabled cell phone)....and who knows what kind of devices could be dynamically added in the future, without having to rewire your car/boat, etc. This has lots of benefits... New technologies and capabilities can be dynamically added, so long as you can provision the software on the processor (apps to support the new stuff) on the fly (which is not hard to do even now...especially with Java-based solutions). Having independent devices means it would be easy to pull the GPS receiver/radiator out of your car and velcro it to your backpack when you decide to go for a hike when you park at the trailhead....and use a bt-equipped PDA to display moving map info as you hike (maybe a waterproor ruggedized PDA), rather than the in-car processor and larger nav-panel display. It could also potentially make the solution more affordable...you only buy the pieces you need...and competition for each device would likely lower prices of the components. You could also get more use out of existing devices, such as future PDA's, Cell Phones, Laptops, Tablets (if Bill ever gets his way ;-) ). I guess the overall view I have is that moving to a component-based system, with short range wireless integration of the components could well change the shape of the GPS (and other) markets as we know them. Andrzej Jan Taramina http://www.codestuds.com NOTE: Remove Spamicide(tm) before replying!!! |